← All publications
Your AI writer sucks, here's why
> 📄 Publié : [https://sja-garden.vercel.app/projets/linkedin-x-pipeline/publications-rs/4--publiés/contenu-ia-40-appels-gpt---en](https://sja-garden.vercel.app/projets/linkedin-x-pipeline/publications-rs/4--publiés/contenu-ia-40-appels-gpt---en)
"We use ChatGPT for our SEO content."
Great. How many API calls per page?
"... One?"
There's your problem.
1 prompt = 1 generic piece of content that Google has already seen 10,000 times.
My process for a single page:
1. Scraping the top 10 Google results for the keyword
2. Extracting entities, questions, angles used
3. RAG on 3-5 reliable industry sources
4. 8 to 12 GPT calls in few-shot for the outline
5. 15 to 20 calls for block-by-block writing
6. 5 calls for semantic optimization
7. Final human review
Total: 40 to 50 API calls per page.
Not 1.
The difference?
The 1-call content says the same thing as everyone else.
The 40-call content cites data, covers angles nobody else has touched, answers questions competitors ignore.
Google can tell the difference.
Readers can too.
I tested both approaches on the same site.
1-prompt pages: average position 34.
40+ call pages: average position 11.
Same site. Same domain. Same time period.
The problem isn't AI.
It's how you use it.
A hammer can drive a nail or build a house.
Depends on how many swings you take.
How many AI calls do you make per piece of content?
"We use ChatGPT for our SEO content."
Great. How many API calls per page?
"... One?"
There's your problem.
1 prompt = 1 generic piece of content that Google has already seen 10,000 times.
My process for a single page:
1. Scraping the top 10 Google results for the keyword
2. Extracting entities, questions, angles used
3. RAG on 3-5 reliable industry sources
4. 8 to 12 GPT calls in few-shot for the outline
5. 15 to 20 calls for block-by-block writing
6. 5 calls for semantic optimization
7. Final human review
Total: 40 to 50 API calls per page.
Not 1.
The difference?
The 1-call content says the same thing as everyone else.
The 40-call content cites data, covers angles nobody else has touched, answers questions competitors ignore.
Google can tell the difference.
Readers can too.
I tested both approaches on the same site.
1-prompt pages: average position 34.
40+ call pages: average position 11.
Same site. Same domain. Same time period.
The problem isn't AI.
It's how you use it.
A hammer can drive a nail or build a house.
Depends on how many swings you take.
How many AI calls do you make per piece of content?
